BHL Bogen

BHL Bogen
BridgehouseLaw LLP - Your Business Law Firm

Thursday, July 08, 2021

Important NIE Update – NIEs Automatically Extended For 12 Months

 

IMPORTANT NIE UPDATE – Covid-19 Travel Ban-related NIEs Auto-extended for 12 Months from Approval

NIEs automatically extended for 12 months

 

On July 6, 2021, the U.S. Department of State (DOS) announced that travel ban-related National Interest Exceptions (NIEs) issued in the last 12 months will be automatically extended for 12 months from the date of approval, and for multiple entries. The extension is only valid so long as the purpose for travel remains the same as the purpose under which the NIE was granted. This NIE extension applies to travelers located in the following locations: China, Iran, Brazil, South Africa, the Schengen Area, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and India.

If You Have An Existing NIE

For those with existing NIEs, this extension applies retroactively from the date that your NIE was granted. Based on communications with various U.S. consular posts, it appears that no additional steps are needed to effectuate this extension, though we encourage each NIE recipient to confirm the extension process with the issuing consular post. The U.S. consulate in Frankfurt, Germany, has confirmed that its NIE recipients should re-print the NIE approval email from the U.S. consular post or reference the “NIE” annotation on the visa if issued with such an annotation. Please note, the 12-month and multiple entry extension is only valid so long as the purpose of your travel remains the same as the purpose for which the NIE was granted.

If You Do Not Have An NIE Yet 

For those who have not yet applied for or received initial NIE approval, the above extension would apply automatically from the date of your approval. This extension does not affect the NIE application or approval process. NIE applicants still cannot be located in the U.S. when applying, meaning those currently in the U.S. will still need to depart the U.S. before applying, as has been the case since the NIE program began. The NIE extension also does not affect the qualifications that the applicant must possess to receive NIE approval: vital support or executive direction to companies involved with U.S. critical infrastructure, vital support or executive direction for significant economic activity in the U.S., extraordinary humanitarian circumstances, medical or national security support, etc.

If you have any questions regarding the new NIE guidance, please contact our firm at immigration.bridgehouselaw@gmail.comFor those interested in updates on this new guidance, please subscribe to our newsletter. We will send updates through the newsletter as more information becomes available.  

College Athletes Can Now Earn Money Off Their Name, Image, and Likeness

 

College Athletes Can Now Earn Money Off Their Name, Image, and Likeness

July 1, 2021, will forever be an impactful date in the history of college sports as the US Supreme Court motions to overturn NCAA rules which, up until this point, have limited the educational benefits offered to college athletes. These long-standing rules have denied players various forms of monetary compensation that would be earned from the revenue produced by the “name, image, and likeness” of said athletes.

At the basis of the Supreme Court’s decision is the argument that these rules, implemented by the NCAA, violate the nation’s antitrust laws. However, the NCAA states that these rules should be exempt from the normal operation of the antitrust laws as they are in place to preserve the amateur nature of this college sport. Additionally, they argue that this preservation is essential as it gives the consumers a wider variety of viewing options- either college sports or professional sports.

The opposition to this ruling speculates that this is a huge loss for the NCAA and could potentially drastically change the amateurism model the league has operated with for years. This matter begs the question: will fans still be as charismatic and excited when watching these college games? However, the athletes argue that the multi-billion dollar business that the NCAA has become should rightfully compensate those bringing in the vast majority of the revenue. Additionally, they contend that, just like any other business in the United States, the NCAA must agree to pay their workers, in this case, the athletes, a fair market rate. They state that “the NCAA is not above the law.”

For more articles about international business, law, and much more, check out our blog!