What Businesses Can Learn from Taylor Swift’s “Father Figure” Decision
Perspectives on international business law, immigration, and litigation from our offices in Atlanta, Charlotte, Berlin, Cologne, Guatemala City, São Paulo, and Vancouver.
As part of our ongoing effort to support our international clients operating across borders, we’re highlighting a topic of growing importance: U.S. economic sanctions and their impact on Italian businesses.
As global commerce becomes increasingly interconnected, Italian businesses — whether in finance, manufacturing, energy, or tech — are more likely than ever to find themselves subject to the reach of U.S. sanctions. While many Italian companies assume that U.S. laws do not apply to their operations unless they have a physical presence in the United States, the long arm of U.S. sanctions law says otherwise.
Let's explore how U.S. sanctions can impact Italian companies and the legal steps international clients can take to ensure compliance and avoid costly enforcement actions.
I. Why U.S. Sanctions Matter to Italian Firms
The U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), enforces economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals. These sanctions target countries (e.g., Russia, Iran, North Korea), individuals, entities, and even sectors (like energy or defense tech). The sanctions are enforced against a broad list of countries, individuals, and business sectors. Even if a transaction involves non-U.S. parties, Italian companies may still fall under OFAC jurisdiction if:
In short, proximity to the U.S. — not just physical presence — triggers legal risk.
Last, even without a U.S. branch or office, Italian companies can fall under U.S. jurisdiction — sometimes inadvertently.
II. Real-World Risk Scenarios
Several common international business scenarios have drawn OFAC’s scrutiny, including:
Continuing, other common scenarios that trigger risk:
III. Enforcement is Real — and Expensive
In recent years, OFAC has pursued enforcement actions not only against American companies but against foreign firms as well. European banks, shipping companies, and logistics providers have all faced multimillion-dollar penalties for violating sanctions — sometimes due to a single transaction. Even when not fined, companies found to be in breach can be “blacklisted,” face frozen assets or lose access to U.S. financial services — a near-death sentence for many international businesses.
IV. What You Can Do Now
To protect your business and maintain compliance, we recommend the following proactive steps:
V. Conclusion
Last, for Italian exporters and financial institutions, ignorance is no longer an excuse. U.S. sanctions law has a global reach — and the cost of noncompliance can be severe. With proper diligence, screening, and legal advice, Italian companies can stay protected while continuing to do business in a complex international landscape.
Final Thought
At BridgeHouseLaw Firm, we help Italian clients navigate the intersection of U.S. law and international trade with clarity, strategy, and confidence. If your business is involved in cross-border deals, exports, or investment transactions that may touch U.S. systems or laws, we encourage you to contact our International Compliance Team for a confidential consultation.
Salvatore internicola, Law Clerk, BridgehouseLaw LLP, Charlotte, NC
image: UK ETA app
We hope you enjoyed the Chinese Connection Morning Musing series.
Did you learn something? Let us know your thoughts, please.
Do you have any topics you wish Reinhard would muse on?
Thank you, Colin Verba and Judgement War Productions LLC for producing this video series.

A lawsuit was filed recently against Lowes seeking $20 million USD in damages. This case shows how easily even a high-level corporation can run into trouble in these difficult times.
At a Lowe's store in California, a customer encountered a man on the same aisle but not wearing a face mask. Out of concern for his health and the health of others, the customer asked the man to put on a mask. Since the customer had underlying health conditions, it is understandable that he was taking the executive order seriously and wanting others to do so as well.
According to the lawsuit, the customer asked the man multiple times to wear a mask. When those requests failed, the customer went to a Lowe's employee and asked him to do address the unmasked man. The Lowe's employee did nothing. Upon the Lowe’s employee’s failure to intervene, as the customer was calling the police, the maskless man spat in the customer’s face four times in rapid succession. As such, the customer is now suing Lowe's for not properly protecting its customers by allowing a maskless man into its store.
The lawsuit demonstrates that whatever steps Lowe’s had taken previously regarding in-store safety and mask-wearing, those procedures appear to have broken down to the point that the lawsuit states that, effectively, Lowe’s had NO policy. If Lowe’s had such policies and protocols in place, a relevant question is whether the employee followed such policies and protocols.
The takeaway is that businesses must have rules and procedures in place for a myriad of difficult situations in these trying and stressful times. Specific to mask-wearing, it is critical to have a coherent policy in place. Once you have those procedures in place, you must clearly communicate them to every employee and train for and practice them. Doing this is an excellent way to limit conflicts and the potential for future liability.
With COVID-19 still very prevalent, the last thing that any business needs a lawsuit. Be sure to have rules and procedures in place for COVID-19, as well as any other situation that could possibly result in a lawsuit.
An unmasked man went into Lowe's and spat on a customer attempting to protect himself and others. The customer alleges that Lowe's failed to have proper protocols in place to stop unmasked individuals from entering the store and then to protect other customers upon entering the store. It is critical for businesses to document the policies and procedurals put into place, and also critical to ensure that employees are equipped to implement and execute on such policies and procedures. If you have any further questions, contact BridgehouseLaw.
This article was inspired by a Morning Musings video. To watch it, click here.
To read another article on this situation click here.
Make sure to follow us on social media!
![]()