BHL Bogen

BHL Bogen
BridgehouseLaw LLP - Your Business Law Firm

Monday, September 29, 2025

Recent US Immigration Updates – H-1B Visas, USCIS Discretion, and Naturalization

 H-1B Visas:

On September 19, 2025, the Trump Administration imposed a one-time $100,000.00 USD fee on certain new H-1B visa applications which are submitting beginning on September 21, 2025. While this fee update does not affect prior applicants, current H-1B visa holders, or other non-immigrant visa holders or lawful permanent residents, it financially restricts the ability of foreign workers to enter the U.S. on H-1B visa status.

The fee must be paid in connection with any new H-1B visa application where the intended beneficiary is outside the U.S. when filing. Importantly, this fee is not an annual or otherwise recurring event; nor does it affect H-1B extensions. Although guidance is unclear, National Interest Exemptions may still be granted case-by-case.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) also recently proposed significant alterations to the H-1B visa selection process, which, if put into effect, would enact a weighted-selection system favoring higher-wage roles instead of the existing lottery-style process. Employers must disclose information concerning the Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) wage rate for the proposed H-1B role. This proposal still permits H-1B issuance at various wage levels, but higher wage level roles would be entered into the lottery more times than lower wage level roles.

Additionally, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) received a new mechanism of discretionary compliance enforcement over H-1B visa issuances – “Project Firewall” permits the Secretary of Labor to investigate H-1B visa cases where it identifies a reasonable cause. Although more granular guidance is pending, we can expect “reasonable cause” to include suspicion of underpaying wages, misrepresentation of H-1B visa job scope, undue displacement of U.S. workers by incoming H-1B visa employees, and similar. In short, employers can anticipate increased scrutiny and/or investigations for H-1B petitions and associated job and wage classifications.

USCIS Discretion:

Side-stepping from updates specific to the H-1B visa process, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has issued updates over the past two months confirming it may discretionarily deny U.S. entry to foreign individuals for expressing anti-American and/or antisemitic sentiments on social media. This discretion most likely also applies to any such sentiments expressed offline that are brought to USCIS’s attention.

Naturalization and Moral Character:

USCIS is also updating standards for naturalization applications. Good moral character was previously considered only in cases involving disqualifying evidence of poor moral character, such as criminal, drug, or other offenses. Now, USCIS will discretionarily consider whether a naturalization applicant possesses good moral character based on the body of evidence submitted with a given application. Items of consideration may include educational and professional achievements, tax compliance, and community involvement.

Brief Recommendations:

    Employers should be intentional when considering H-1B visa hires and when deciding to go through any new H-1B process. We recommend maintaining proper records for all new H-1B visa processes to preemptively prepare to support compliance with the updated application procedures.

In light of updated USCIS discretion, we recommend that employers instruct foreign workers considering travel to the U.S. to ensure their social media use does not express anti-American or antisemitic sentiment.

Naturalization applicants may consider procuring at least one signed affidavit from a U.S. citizen attesting to their good moral character to support their application positively.

Please do not hesitate to contact Bridgehouse Law for bespoke guidance on these topics.

Cole Haaf, Attorney (NC, MA), BridgehouseLaw LLP
image: iStock

Monday, September 22, 2025

Finding Calm in the Chaos: How ASMR Can Support Wellness in Any Profession

In today’s fast-paced world, many professionals balance heavy workloads, tight deadlines, and nonstop communication. With so much mental noise, it's no surprise that people are turning to unconventional tools for stress relief. One such tool that’s gained popularity across industries is Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response (ASMR).


ASMR is a calming, tingling sensation triggered by soft sounds like whispering, tapping, or paper rustling. While it might sound unusual initially, many people find ASMR helpful for relaxing their minds, especially during a midday break or before bed. For professionals constantly “on,” this gentle sensory experience can serve as a simple, low-effort way to reset.


Millions now turn to ASMR videos, playlists, and podcasts to unwind, manage anxiety, or improve focus. Whether working from a corner office or your kitchen table, finding moments of calm can boost clarity, reduce stress, and improve overall productivity.


So next time your day feels overwhelming, try exploring an ASMR video or audio track. You might be surprised by how much your brain appreciates the break.


Kelsey Greene, Law Clerk, BridgehouseLaw Charlotte

image: iStock

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Taylor Swift and the Power of Owning Your Work: A Legal Perspective

When Taylor Swift made headlines for re-recording her early albums, she sparked more than a pop culture moment; she highlighted a crucial legal issue in the music industry: intellectual property ownership.

Originally, Swift’s masters (the original recordings of her songs) were owned by her former record label, which later sold them without her input. In response, Swift exercised her legal right to re-record her music, creating new masters she controls. Thanks to a combination of U.S. copyright law and careful planning, these re-recordings are legally distinct works, which means she can promote, license, and profit from them instead of the originals. This move empowers her financially and creatively and sets a precedent in contract negotiations.

From a legal standpoint, Swift’s strategy underscores the importance of reviewing contract terms, especially those related to licensing, ownership, and reversion rights. It reminds creatives and business owners alike that who owns their work matters.

Her bold legal move turned a private contract dispute into a global lesson in intellectual property rights, strategic leverage, and the value of knowing your legal options. At the intersection of pop culture and legal power, Taylor Swift reminded the world that ownership isn’t just a business move; it’s a statement. 

If you're curious about protecting your intellectual property or navigating contracts carefully, our team is here to help.


Kelsey Greene, Law Clerk, BridgehouseLaw LLP, Charlotte, NC

image: iStock

Monday, September 08, 2025

Beyond the Headlines: Understanding Executive Orders and Their Limits

Every election cycle, executive orders dominate the news, welcomed by some as bold leadership and criticized by others as overreach. But what exactly is an executive order, and how much power does it really carry? Understanding how they work helps cut through the noise and see the legal reality behind the politics.


An executive order is a legally binding directive issued by the President (or a state governor) to manage the operations of government agencies. These orders can shape how existing laws are enforced, direct funding priorities, or establish task forces. They’re a powerful tool, but they are not laws themselves, and they can’t override legislation passed by Congress.


For example, a president might issue an executive order to direct federal agencies to enforce environmental standards more strictly, but they can’t unilaterally ban fossil fuels without congressional approval.


Importantly, executive orders are subject to judicial review. Courts can, and do, strike them down if they exceed legal authority or violate constitutional rights. Many high-profile orders in recent years have been blocked, delayed, or limited by the courts, illustrating the checks and balances built into our system. So, while executive orders can grab headlines and shift short-term policy, they often face legal, political, and practical constraints.


Kelsey Greene, Law Clerk, BridgehouseLaw LLP, Charlotte, NC

image:iStock